<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>control-repo-template/site, branch 1.1.0-lnde</title>
<subtitle>puppetlabs/control-repo extended with not-so-core stuff</subtitle>
<id>https://git.pfeiffer.tech/control-repo-template/atom?h=1.1.0-lnde</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.pfeiffer.tech/control-repo-template/atom?h=1.1.0-lnde'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.pfeiffer.tech/control-repo-template/'/>
<updated>2019-02-26T17:14:15Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Remove symlink site -&gt; site-modules</title>
<updated>2019-02-26T17:14:15Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Reid Vandewiele</name>
<email>reid@puppetlabs.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-02-25T17:08:36Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.pfeiffer.tech/control-repo-template/commit/?id=baa4b92a8801df4ad026da13b0e0bd68c5cbdd3a'/>
<id>urn:sha1:baa4b92a8801df4ad026da13b0e0bd68c5cbdd3a</id>
<content type='text'>
The symlink served for a good discussion point around change impact, but
in the end having it makes for a more confusing experience overall both
to new users cloning the control-repo to get started and also to anyone
accustomed to "site". A new user won't miss "site". A symlink will muddy
the waters over the change for long-time users. Better for clarity to be
all-in and not include a symlink.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Add symlink from site to site-modules for compatibility</title>
<updated>2019-02-04T21:04:11Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Nick Walker</name>
<email>nick.walker@puppetlabs.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-02-04T21:04:11Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.pfeiffer.tech/control-repo-template/commit/?id=80494c198b07557713ae3d44811935fcd9b215da'/>
<id>urn:sha1:80494c198b07557713ae3d44811935fcd9b215da</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Rename site directory to site-modules</title>
<updated>2019-02-01T00:58:13Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Nick Walker</name>
<email>nick.walker@puppetlabs.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-02-01T00:58:13Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.pfeiffer.tech/control-repo-template/commit/?id=ead7f3c706657bbfae37ff40c8f919fb57c8a841'/>
<id>urn:sha1:ead7f3c706657bbfae37ff40c8f919fb57c8a841</id>
<content type='text'>
Prior to this commit, we placed modules local to a users installation
in the `site` directory.  This was just a convention and the name
`site` doesn't clearly convey what it is for.

After this commit, we place modules local to a users installation in
the `site-modules` directory.  This makes it more clear to users
that this is a directory that modules go i.  When users start
with bolt they won't even know what a control-repo is and
renaming site to site-modules gives them a better idea of why
they should put their modules with tasks in them.  Also see:

https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/BOLT-1108
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Removed old role</title>
<updated>2016-06-14T04:37:43Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Dylan Ratcliffe</name>
<email>dylan.ratcliffe@puppet.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-06-14T04:37:43Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.pfeiffer.tech/control-repo-template/commit/?id=aa2dba158b5433272acaa69dde43abb1d6cc200b'/>
<id>urn:sha1:aa2dba158b5433272acaa69dde43abb1d6cc200b</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Reduce the scope of the control-repo to mostly an example</title>
<updated>2016-03-29T22:53:10Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Nick Walker</name>
<email>nick.walker@puppetlabs.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-03-23T17:31:33Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.pfeiffer.tech/control-repo-template/commit/?id=2c98a9264c2070281dc7628d5bcb176eb0fdb200'/>
<id>urn:sha1:2c98a9264c2070281dc7628d5bcb176eb0fdb200</id>
<content type='text'>
Prior to this commit, the control-repo was an example of the
structure of a control repo but it also included puppet code to
help setup code manager and instructions to get that all setup
in a very specific way.

This was great for users that wanted to follow those instructions
exactly but wasn't great for people just looking for an example to
start from.

After this commit, the control-repo will be just an example once
again and a new repo somehwere else will pop up to provide the
explicit instructions on how to use the example with code manager.

There are links added to puppetlabs/control-repo to a new repo
that will have a version of the code that once lived in
puppetlabs/control-repo
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Move stash profile out to its own 'profile' module</title>
<updated>2016-03-24T21:07:16Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Nick Walker</name>
<email>nick.walker@puppetlabs.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-03-24T21:07:16Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.pfeiffer.tech/control-repo-template/commit/?id=b3519dd48cebfcdbf1dea4b42e8857e21e6f05a2'/>
<id>urn:sha1:b3519dd48cebfcdbf1dea4b42e8857e21e6f05a2</id>
<content type='text'>
Prior to this commit, there was a stash profile in the site dir
of this control-repo.

After this commit, the profile has been moved to it's own repo
where it can be used more generally and not tightly coupled to this
repository.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Move gitlab profile out to its own 'profile' module</title>
<updated>2016-03-24T15:27:17Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Nick Walker</name>
<email>nick.walker@puppetlabs.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-03-24T15:27:17Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.pfeiffer.tech/control-repo-template/commit/?id=ff6f140529b646e09fb66952abfbe6fa7b4cc746'/>
<id>urn:sha1:ff6f140529b646e09fb66952abfbe6fa7b4cc746</id>
<content type='text'>
Prior to this commit, there was a gitlab profile in the site dir
of this control-repo.

After this commit, the profile has been moved to it's own repo
where it can be used more generally and not tightly coupled to this
repository.

As a result, the gitlab role has been removed from this repository
as well.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Move puppetmaster profile to rampup_profile_puppetmaster module</title>
<updated>2016-03-23T22:55:58Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Nick Walker</name>
<email>nick.walker@puppetlabs.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-03-23T22:53:41Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.pfeiffer.tech/control-repo-template/commit/?id=9503f54349756fe7a93eecf2ecc6620c340f4679'/>
<id>urn:sha1:9503f54349756fe7a93eecf2ecc6620c340f4679</id>
<content type='text'>
Prior to this commit, the puppetmaster profile was embedded in this
control-repo.

After this commit, the puppetmaster profile is moved out into its
own module.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Clean up some stale files</title>
<updated>2016-03-23T17:22:02Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Nick Walker</name>
<email>nick.walker@puppetlabs.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-03-23T17:22:02Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.pfeiffer.tech/control-repo-template/commit/?id=5185a4cb2691796953a5f22359cb91592af3ea6c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:5185a4cb2691796953a5f22359cb91592af3ea6c</id>
<content type='text'>
Prior to this commit, these two files were laying around but not used.
The code manager template was missed when the code was moved into
a module and the function was added a while ago but then never
put to use.

After this commit, the codebase is a little lighter without these
stale files.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Move profile::git_webhook into seperate module pe_code_manager_webhook</title>
<updated>2016-03-17T21:33:01Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Nick Walker</name>
<email>nick.walker@puppetlabs.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-02-25T23:23:12Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.pfeiffer.tech/control-repo-template/commit/?id=00d3aa1f4f835a78e14827d5ac1ae9e94bc3f924'/>
<id>urn:sha1:00d3aa1f4f835a78e14827d5ac1ae9e94bc3f924</id>
<content type='text'>
Prior to this commit the functionality to setup the either code
manager or zack/r10k was tightly coupled to this control-repo. In
an effort to make that functionality useful to more people we're
splitting it into a dedicated module.

After this commit, the pe_code_manager_webhook module will contain all logic
around setting up the webhook while this control-repo will still
gloss over the details needed to get everything in PE setup correctly
to use that module.

This commit removes the files associated with the profile including
some custom functions that were only there to make it work.

This commit removes the all_in_one_pe_2015_2 role as it was exactly
the same as the all_in_one_pe role.

This commit modifies all_in_one_pe to use the pe_code_manager_webhook module
instead of the profile.
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
